Skip to main content

RACISM, FORGIVENESS, RECONCILIATION

The first memorial service honoring George Floyd was held June 4, 2020 at North Central University (NCU), A Pentecostal Christian university in Minneapolis, Minnesota (StarTribune). Mr. Floyd was brutally murdered May 25, 2020 when a police officer knelt on his neck for 8 minutes and 46 seconds until he died.

 Ten years ago, Dr. Renea Brathwaite, a recent Dean for Professional Studies at NCU, was a PhD candidate. He wrote an essay about racial reconciliation from “An Afro-Pentecostal Perspective.”
 I reread his essay and find it more current than ever.

 In the essay, Brathwaite tells the story of the interracial revival in the early years of American Pentecostalism—notably the Azusa Street Revival in Los Angeles. Early on, there was excitement over the crossing of the “color line.” Unfortunately, in the spirit of the times, Blacks and Whites went their separate ways and established congregations and eventually denominations or fellowships along racial lines.

 As he concludes his essay, his comments strike at the heart of the current racist divide in US society.

Racial interaction is not racial reconciliation. It can be a distraction and is an insultingly poor substitute that only makes the real task harder. More explicitly stated, staging racially-mixed events without the deep work of forgiveness and reconciliation is a superficial masquerade that simultaneously a) allows the real wounds of disharmony and prejudice to putrefy and b) tranquilizes those involved. Resultantly, unwary participants in this charade think that the “race problem” (What race problem?!) has been resolved, when in reality it has only been submerged and transformed into something even more insidious and all the more difficult to eradicate. No longer is it on the surface where it can be named, confronted, and exorcised; it is now the subliminal (and even institutionalized) fabric from which human relationships are sown. (pp. 83-84)

See Dr. Brathwaite's analysis in Chapter 4 

In the context of the 2020 protests--both violent and nonviolent--it is clear that intergroup relationships are in serious need of repair. Racial and ethnic prejudices are common to human beings as is ingroup favoritism or privilege.

Brathwaite rightly claims "Racial interaction is not racial reconciliation." This  "racial interaction" was the false promise of desegregation. It was right to desegregate the schools and society. In favorable settings, mixed race or ethnic interactions help reduce prejudice as posited by contact theory; however, when there is a history of injury--including murder--perpetrated by one group on another, interaction is not enough--it can indeed by an insult.

Group leaders must lead the way to admission of wrongdoing, offering sincere apologies, seeking and granting forgiveness, and initiating steps designed to build trust--that key component of effective reconciliation.

Because prejudice is a part of the human condition, groups will find ways to discriminate against other groups thus societal leaders will always need to work at identifying and addressing prejudices, negative stereotypes, and ingroup favoritism.

In the US, ingroup favoritism (aka White Privilege) continues to be evident in political, economic, and criminal justice systems. In segregated religious organizations (schools, nonprofits), ingroup favoritism persists as well. I cannot speak about other nations, but the protests around the world in 2020 suggest other societies face similar intergroup struggles.

Reference

Brathwaite, R. (2010). The Azusa Street revival and racial reconciliation: An Afro-Pentecostal perspective. In M. Mittelstadt & G. W. Sutton (eds). Forgiveness, reconciliation, and restoration: Multidisciplinary studies from a Pentecostal perspective. (pp 65-87). Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.

















RELATED POSTS
Multidimensional Prejudice

Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination


Connections

My Page    www.suttong.com
  
My Books  AMAZON                       GOOGLE STORE

FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton
TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton

Publications (many free downloads)
 
Academia   Geoff W Sutton   (PhD)     
  ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton   (PhD)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EASTER: VARIATIONS IN BELIEF

Differences in Religious & Spiritual Beliefs Relevant to the Easter Story By Geoffrey W. Sutton, Ph.D. at suttong.com Like most Christians, my wife and I attend an Easter Service. And, a s usual, the media rise to the Spring occasion with Bible stories, comments from various religious leaders and a few atheists—just to keep things balanced. Other religions are on the back burner until Monday. So many statements of beliefs come from the Easter events.  For now, here’s a sample of some core beliefs from various sources. God: 51% believe in God as in the Bible Statista (May, 2023) reported US belief "in God as described in holy scriptures" at 51%. Another 22% reported a belief in a higher power or spirit. Pew researchers from 2021 find 58% believe in God as described in the Bible and another 32% believe in a God or Higher Power.  Belief in God is obviously a core belief. U.S. belief has declined to 58% having no doubt God exists and another 17% have do...

9 Beliefs of Christian Counselors

Updated 26 Feb 2018 What Christian Counselors Believe, Value, and Practice Part I: Beliefs I once asked a conservative evangelical Christian Chaplain how he handled counseling when he was pretty sure a dying patient was not a Christian and, according to his tradition, would soon spend eternity in hell. He sincerely said he would have to think about that question. A female health care provider told me she switched jobs so she could work with children rather than seniors, because she believed that, unlike the elderly, children would go to heaven if they died. In this case, her Christian beliefs appeared to have a cause -effect influence on her career. Counselors normally focus on the needs of clients and help clients find solutions in a supportive setting. Theoretically, rapport ought to be enhanced when counselors and clients share common values and beliefs.  Why ask what Christian Counselors Believe? The primary reason ...

The Turing Test and Chat Psychotherapy 2025

  Where are we now? The Turing Test, originally called the "Imitation Game," is a concept proposed by Alan Turing in 1950 to address the question, "Can machines think?". Instead of trying to define the complex notion of "thinking," Turing suggested a practical test to determine whether a machine could exhibit behavior indistinguishable from that of a human (Vation Ventures.com). How it works Participants: Three individuals participate: The Interrogator (Judge): A human whose goal is to determine which of the other two participants is human and which is a machine. Human Participant: A human who aims to convince the interrogator that they are human. Machine Participant: A computer program that strives to imitate human conversation and responses so effectively that the interrogator cannot reliably distinguish it from the human participant. Communication : All three participants are isolated from each other and communicate solely through a text-based interf...