How do you interpret the news?

George Washington Out of Context, 2025
Geoffrey Sutton and Artspace.ai

How Do You Interpret the News?

How Do We Put Today's News in Context?

When asked what something means, we usually respond based on our context, which involves an interaction between ourselves, other people, and our location. By location I mean our geographic place and our historical timeframe.

For example, the words ‘Civil War’ evoke different associations if heard in England or the USA, or through media from different nations. These two events occurred some 200 years apart.

There is a connection. President George Washington’s great-grandfather John Washington was a royalist who supported King Charles I against Parliament. Thus, context is not just about spatial location but also time. President Washington and the Continental Congress likely considered the issues of the Civil War (the English one).

When significant changes occur in a nation, as reported in the news today, we try to put them into context. Unfortunately, we all have different contexts, with various associations tagged with positive or negative emotions or a mix. Often, we respond to images, names, and words without much thought (system 1 thinking). It takes effort to examine a matter carefully before deciding how to respond (system 2 thinking).

*****

Each day, those who read social media posts and news are exposed to contexts linked to different perspectives on history.

Those of us who have lived several decades may well have different opinions when it comes to associations with specific people and concepts that have not crossed the news feeds of younger citizens.

Context is our current situation and our view of events in that context is influenced by our ever-changing worldview.

Suggestions

On matters of great importance, invest time to think carefully about what a proposed policy or law might mean for us and others. How does it fit in our context like the US Constitution or our local laws?

Religious people might consider their core values and ponder how those fit with a proposed policy or law. What does it mean to have religious freedom?

How does your context influence your views of some classic virtues?

If you value loyalty, are their conditions when you would end that loyalty?

If you value respect for authority, under what conditions would you act to replace that authority with another?

If you value equality, how do you intend to deal with factors placing people in unequal situations such as differences in family wealth, access to high paying employment, ability to perform exceptionally well in various venues like music and sports, or other endeavors where inequality is present?

If you value fairness, then explain what you mean by fairness?

If you value freedom, then how free are you willing to let someone else live without imposing your values on them?

*****

Here are a few people and concepts that may trigger quick, automatic emotional associations for some Americans. Factors like age, ethnicity, religion, political ideologies are likely to contextualize a response. A "blank expression" may be the response of those lacking a stored context. Others may have a context "injected" by friends or relatives.

Communism

Feminism

Racism

Russia

Hydrogen Bomb

Korea

Vietnam

Richard Nixon

Bill Clinton

Birmingham, Alabama

Little Rock, Arkansas

Freedom of speech

Freedom of the press

Freedom of Religion

China

Constitutional, Unconstitutional

Ukraine

Christian

Muslim

Atheist

9/11

You get the idea.

Resources

Mt Vernon - History

Thinking Dual Process

Thinking, Fast and Slow

Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is www.suttong.com

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on AMAZON or GOOGLE STORE

Follow on FACEBOOK Geoff W. Sutton

X @Geoff.W.Sutton

You can read many published articles at no charge:

Academia Geoff W Sutton ResearchGate Geoffrey W Sutton

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.

EASTER: VARIATIONS IN BELIEF

Differences in Religious & Spiritual Beliefs Relevant to the Easter Story By Geoffrey W. Sutton, Ph.D. at suttong.com Like most Christians, my wife and I attend an Easter Service. And, a s usual, the media rise to the Spring occasion with Bible stories, comments from various religious leaders and a few atheists—just to keep things balanced. Other religions are on the back burner until Monday. So many statements of beliefs come from the Easter events. For now, here’s a sample of some core beliefs from various sources. God: 51% believe in God as in the Bible Statista (May, 2023) reported US belief "in God as described in holy scriptures" at 51%. Another 22% reported a belief in a higher power or spirit. Pew researchers from 2021 find 58% believe in God as described in the Bible and another 32% believe in a God or Higher Power. Belief in God is obviously a core belief. U.S. belief has declined to 58% having no doubt God exists and another 17% have do...

9 Beliefs of Christian Counselors

Updated 26 Feb 2018 What Christian Counselors Believe, Value, and Practice Part I: Beliefs I once asked a conservative evangelical Christian Chaplain how he handled counseling when he was pretty sure a dying patient was not a Christian and, according to his tradition, would soon spend eternity in hell. He sincerely said he would have to think about that question. A female health care provider told me she switched jobs so she could work with children rather than seniors, because she believed that, unlike the elderly, children would go to heaven if they died. In this case, her Christian beliefs appeared to have a cause -effect influence on her career. Counselors normally focus on the needs of clients and help clients find solutions in a supportive setting. Theoretically, rapport ought to be enhanced when counselors and clients share common values and beliefs. Why ask what Christian Counselors Believe? The primary reason ...

The Turing Test and Chat Psychotherapy 2025

Where are we now? The Turing Test, originally called the "Imitation Game," is a concept proposed by Alan Turing in 1950 to address the question, "Can machines think?". Instead of trying to define the complex notion of "thinking," Turing suggested a practical test to determine whether a machine could exhibit behavior indistinguishable from that of a human (Vation Ventures.com). How it works Participants: Three individuals participate: The Interrogator (Judge): A human whose goal is to determine which of the other two participants is human and which is a machine. Human Participant: A human who aims to convince the interrogator that they are human. Machine Participant: A computer program that strives to imitate human conversation and responses so effectively that the interrogator cannot reliably distinguish it from the human participant. Communication : All three participants are isolated from each other and communicate solely through a text-based interf...

Geoffrey W. Sutton PhD, Psychology and Culture

Search This Blog