Skip to main content

Fundamentalism and Biblical Literalism

Viewing a Sacred Book 2023
by Geoffrey W. Sutton & Bing AI

 

Are Conservative and Progressive Christians Trading Insults?

I'm in the process of writing about the assessment of spirituality, which I hope to complete by the end of the year. I've come across articles and research measures attempting to clarify the related concepts of fundamentalism and biblical literalism. And so, I have a question about the meaning of these terms and wonder if there is a way to delineate different approaches that recognizes differences but does not appear to denigrate the perspective of people with different views.

Here's a summary of what I've found.

Researchers have examined differences within religious traditions in the way subgroups of people communicate about their beliefs and live out their faith. Writing in Christianity Today (2023) Tim Pietz begins his essay on fundamentalism by noting the negative connotation of two of the terms (bold added for emphasis): “Fundamentalist” is often wielded as an insult to conservative evangelical Christians….” Two paragraphs later, he adds the concept of literalism taken from the Merriam-Webster dictionary: “a movement in 20th century Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to Christian life and teaching…). 

The assessment of fundamentalism has varied form a widely used measure, which referenced such Christian concepts (e.g., God, Satan) as in the Religious Fundamentalism Scale (RFS; Altemeyer & Hunsberger, 1992) to a focus on the authoritative communication of God in a group’s sacred text, which includes items applicable to other faiths (e.g., Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale, IFS; Williamson et al., 2010). However, two features of fundamentalism (literalism, conservatism) continue to draw attention in the 21st century (e.g., Biblical Conservatism Measure, Weyand et al., 2013; Biblical Literalism Scale, Village, 2005). 

Selective Literalism

What might be missing is the concept of selective literalism, which recognizes that conservative Christians do not read all biblical texts from a literal perspective. They understand nonliteral portions of texts that include metaphors and parables but may differentially reject metaphorical or nonliteral interpretations of other texts informed by their group’s doctrines such as text-informed beliefs about creation, heaven, hell, or Jesus’ virgin birth.

Perhaps we need a measure that allows for a range of possible interpretations of major textual differences from a literal interpretation to a selection of less literal options, which might allow us to measure selective literalism. Surely no one believes Jesus is a door or a vine. But, I had the impression as a child that some clergy genuinely believed there was some sort of eternal flame in hell that tormented people forever.

Measuring Fundamentalism

I have posted information on these scales in another blog. Following are the names and links.

Biblical Literalism Scale (BLS)

Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale (IFS)

More Scales on Spirituality

See the list and my handbook.

Spiritual Assessment


Post Author

Geoffrey W. Sutton, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Evangel University, holds a master’s degree in counseling and a PhD in psychology from the University of Missouri-Columbia. His postdoctoral work encompassed education and supervision in forensic and neuropsychology. As a licensed psychologist, he conducted clinical and neuropsychological evaluations and provided psychotherapy for patients in various settings, including schools, hospitals, and private offices. During his tenure as a professor, Dr. Sutton taught courses on psychotherapy, assessment, and research. He has authored over one hundred publications, including books, book chapters, and articles in peer-reviewed psychology journals. 

His website is https://suttong.com You can find Dr. Sutton's books on   AMAZON    and  GOOGLE. Many publications are free to download at ResearchGate   and Academia  

 References

Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113-133. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202


Hogge, J.H., & Friedman, S.T. (1967). The scriptural literalism scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 66, 275-279.


Pietz, T. (2023, April 20). What is Christian fundamentalism? History and meaning. Retrieved August 18, 2023 from https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-terms/what-fundamentalist-history-meaning.html


Village, A. (2005) Factors shaping biblical literalism: a study among Anglican laity. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 26:1, 29-38, DOI: 10.1080/13617670500047566

Weyand, C., O'Laughlin, L., & Bennett, P. (2013). Dimensions of religiousness that influence parenting. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(3), 182-191. 

Williamson, W. P., Hood, R. W. Jr., Ahmad, A., Sadiq, M., Hill, P. C. (2010). The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: Cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the big 5 factor markers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13, 721-747. doi:10.1080/13674670802643047


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marriage Under Reconstruction

The 1950s imaginary sentimental love man as protein-carbs winner (bring home the bacon & breadwinner) marriage has ended for most people in most Western cultures. Some folks retain that image, or some photoshopped version of it, as the ideal traditional marriage.  Picture the happy couple at church with King James Bibles under their arms and you get the Protestant Christian version of this traditional marriage. Changes are a constant The changes in marriage and romantic relationships in the last few decades are staggering for anyone alive before the 1960s. Human behavior is my business. I am a psychologist. The counseling advice offered to couples seems to reflect the mythology of the decade rather than recommendations sourced in science. I would like to say that the nature and extent of the changes in marriage and romantic relationships have never been seen before in human history. But I am no historian. Nevertheless, the changes call for some consider...
4 comments
Read more

Why Social Spaces Are Psychological Forces

Louise Penny has noted that Quebec, the setting of her novels, operates almost as a character in its own right. This observation is more than literary flair; it reflects a psychological truth. Environments exert influence. They shape perception, emotion, and behavior. In social psychology, we recognize that human functioning is inseparable from context. Our interactions with others affect our mood, cognition, motivation, and even our physiological health. This is why social context is a core dimension of the SCOPES framework. Yet physical environments — even in the absence of people — also exert measurable effects. Consider how interior spaces communicate safety, warmth, or threat. A familiar chair can regulate stress; a poorly designed one can amplify discomfort. Sensory cues such as scent, sound, and texture influence our emotional states in subtle but powerful ways. Outdoor environments operate similarly. Natural settings often promote restoration, while harsh or polluted environmen...
Post a Comment
Read more

EASTER: VARIATIONS IN BELIEF

Differences in Religious & Spiritual Beliefs Relevant to the Easter Story By Geoffrey W. Sutton, Ph.D. at suttong.com Like most Christians, my wife and I attend an Easter Service. And, a s usual, the media rise to the Spring occasion with Bible stories, comments from various religious leaders and a few atheists—just to keep things balanced. Other religions are on the back burner until Monday. So many statements of beliefs come from the Easter events.  For now, here’s a sample of some core beliefs from various sources. God: 51% believe in God as in the Bible Statista (May, 2023) reported US belief "in God as described in holy scriptures" at 51%. Another 22% reported a belief in a higher power or spirit. Pew researchers from 2021 find 58% believe in God as described in the Bible and another 32% believe in a God or Higher Power.  Belief in God is obviously a core belief. U.S. belief has declined to 58% having no doubt God exists and another 17% have do...
Post a Comment
Read more