Skip to main content

Count Your Blessings: A Gratitude Experiment

 



In the past few decades, psychological scientists have studied gratitude along with other virtues as part of the broad field known as positive psychology, which focuses on well-being in contrast to studies of mental disorders. Expressing gratitude is one of those classic virtues encouraged in many cultures.

Short Summary

Two psychological scientists studied the effects of expressing gratitude over a period of 10 weeks. Those in the gratitude group felt better and had fewer health symptoms than those in other groups.

The Experiment

In 2003, two psychological scientists published the results of several studies. Robert Emmons of the University of California, Davis and Michael McCullough of the University of Miami assigned volunteers to one of three groups, which the research team called Gratitude, Hassles, and Events. The study required 10 weekly reports. Here’s what the scientists told each group.

Gratitude group

The gratitude group were asked to think about their past week and list as many as five things that they were thankful for. Some were thankful for their parents, others for a music group, and others expressed thanks to God.

Hassles group

The researchers explained that hassles were those things in life that irritate us at home, school, work and so forth. They were asked to think about their day and list up to five hassles. For example, one listed a “horrible test” and another noted “stupid people driving.”

Events group

The volunteers in the events group were asked to list five events that had an impact on them in the past week. One cleaned a closet and another listed a flight. Overall, 40% listed pleasant events, 30% unpleasant, and the rest were rated as neutral.

Assessment

Each week, the researchers asked the volunteers to rate their mood and health. They collected comments about their feelings and a range of physical symptoms like pain and upset stomach. Other questions asked how they responded to any help they received and their overall wellbeing.

The Results

After creating a measure of gratitude from all the data collected, they compared the ratings for the groups using a one-way ANOVAThe high score obtained by the gratitude writing group was significantly higher than for those in the hassles group but not more than those in the events group.

Feelings: The groups were not significantly different on their ratings of positive or negative feelings.

Wellbeing: The gratitude group had significantly higher ratings.

Expectations: The gratitude group had significantly higher ratings.

Physical health

Symptoms: The gratitude group reported significantly fewer symptoms.

Exercise: The gratitude group spent much more time exercising than those in the hassle group.

Response to help: Those who reported grateful responses to receiving help also reported higher overall wellbeing.

Read more about gratitude and other virtues in Living Well: 10 Big Ideas of Faith and a Meaningful Life.  Buy on AMAZON  

 


Reference

Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: Experimental studies of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377-389. [See study one.]

 

Learn how to conduct surveys in Creating Surveys on AMAZON

 


 Related Post

Grateful People The Big 12 - Psychology of Gratitude

 Please check out my website   www.suttong.com

   and see my books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Also, consider connecting with me on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EASTER: VARIATIONS IN BELIEF

Differences in Religious & Spiritual Beliefs Relevant to the Easter Story By Geoffrey W. Sutton, Ph.D. at suttong.com Like most Christians, my wife and I attend an Easter Service. And, a s usual, the media rise to the Spring occasion with Bible stories, comments from various religious leaders and a few atheists—just to keep things balanced. Other religions are on the back burner until Monday. So many statements of beliefs come from the Easter events.  For now, here’s a sample of some core beliefs from various sources. God: 51% believe in God as in the Bible Statista (May, 2023) reported US belief "in God as described in holy scriptures" at 51%. Another 22% reported a belief in a higher power or spirit. Pew researchers from 2021 find 58% believe in God as described in the Bible and another 32% believe in a God or Higher Power.  Belief in God is obviously a core belief. U.S. belief has declined to 58% having no doubt God exists and another 17% have do...

9 Beliefs of Christian Counselors

Updated 26 Feb 2018 What Christian Counselors Believe, Value, and Practice Part I: Beliefs I once asked a conservative evangelical Christian Chaplain how he handled counseling when he was pretty sure a dying patient was not a Christian and, according to his tradition, would soon spend eternity in hell. He sincerely said he would have to think about that question. A female health care provider told me she switched jobs so she could work with children rather than seniors, because she believed that, unlike the elderly, children would go to heaven if they died. In this case, her Christian beliefs appeared to have a cause -effect influence on her career. Counselors normally focus on the needs of clients and help clients find solutions in a supportive setting. Theoretically, rapport ought to be enhanced when counselors and clients share common values and beliefs.  Why ask what Christian Counselors Believe? The primary reason ...

The Turing Test and Chat Psychotherapy 2025

  Where are we now? The Turing Test, originally called the "Imitation Game," is a concept proposed by Alan Turing in 1950 to address the question, "Can machines think?". Instead of trying to define the complex notion of "thinking," Turing suggested a practical test to determine whether a machine could exhibit behavior indistinguishable from that of a human (Vation Ventures.com). How it works Participants: Three individuals participate: The Interrogator (Judge): A human whose goal is to determine which of the other two participants is human and which is a machine. Human Participant: A human who aims to convince the interrogator that they are human. Machine Participant: A computer program that strives to imitate human conversation and responses so effectively that the interrogator cannot reliably distinguish it from the human participant. Communication : All three participants are isolated from each other and communicate solely through a text-based interf...