ROUND THE WORLD
As I watched the retelling of the story
of Malala Yousafzai on ABCs
20/20, I felt bombarded by conflicting feelings of compassion, admiration,
and anger. Fragments of thoughts quickly flowed along the lines of “How could
anyone murder a little girl just because she wanted to go to school!”
Cover Girl
Malala is the current poster girl—a
covered, cover girl— a living peace memorial representing the repression of
girls and women everywhere.
We in the West are used to the in-your-face
uncovered, bare-bodied, how-dare-you tread on me outrage of Western women. But
Malala evokes a different response. She’s the child who deserves to be
protected. She’s the modest teen who covers. She’s the forgiving one who seeks
no revenge.
Faith
Malala is a girl with faith in God.
Malala offers a message of love, peace, and forgiveness.
“Even if there was a gun in my hand and he was standing in front of me, I would not shoot him. This is the compassion I have learned from Mohamed, the prophet of mercy, Jesus Christ and Lord Buddha. This the legacy of change I have inherited from Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela and Mohammed Ali Jinnah. This is the philosophy of nonviolence that I have learned from Gandhi, Bacha Khan and Mother Teresa. And this is the forgiveness that I have learned from my father and from my mother. This is what my soul is telling me: be peaceful and love everyone.” (Malala at the UN.)
Malala on Fundamentalists
Malala is a religious girl shot by
those with different religious beliefs-- “radical fundamentalist men,” reports Diane
Sawyer of ABC.
- "I think that death didn't want to kill me."
- "And God was with me. And the people prayed for me."
Malala is a Muslim girl who offers a
different face of Islam. Again, from her UN Speech:
"They think that God is a tiny, little conservative being who would send girls to the hell just because of going to school. The terrorists are misusing the name of Islam and Pashtun society for their own personal benefits."
Fundamentalists and women
When hearing stories about
fundamentalists, it becomes easy to turn and look at other fundamentalists.
Those more familiar to us. Christian
fundamentalists informed by biblical texts believe women should be under the
authority of a man. After all, Eve--not Adam-- was deceived (1 Timothy 2:11-15). Women may teach children and
other women but not men. Women can have supportive roles in ministry, but not
leadership roles. Women may not wear men’s clothes. And so forth.
Some Christian fundamentalists are
known for their social protests and their efforts to create laws that limit the
freedom of others. The vocal fundamentalists draw media attention. They insult
contemporary sensibilities. They appear intolerant at best. Some
see fundamentalism as a disease to be diagnosed and cured.
Stereotypes
But there’s a difference. Many
Christian fundamentalists live peacefully with their neighbors. They offer help
in time of need. They seek freedom from laws that impose limits on their
ability to live according to their conscience. They want their people covered. And clothed in righteousness. But not in the blood of their fellow citizens. Being
a Christian fundamentalist is unpopular nowadays. Even Christian Evangelicals
avoid the fundamentalist moniker as if seeking a liberal distance in order to
avoid social condemnation.
Granted, I know Christian
fundamentalists who spew venom against President Obama, gleefully toss racial
epithets, and boisterously bash gays. “Up-in-arms” is almost literal as radical
fundamentalists stockpile guns n’ ammo.
But there are others. Millions of
peaceful, kind-hearted, hard-working, family-friendly people just trying to
negotiate a path through a quagmire of cultural ooze that threatens all they
hold dear.
Stereotypes are handy ways to evaluate
and quickly respond to threats.
But there’s a downside to stereotyping.
We can miss the many Christian fundamentalists
who make good neighbors.
And Christians can be blind to Muslims like Malala Yousafazai,
the face of a Muslim girl who loves peace,
and practices forgiveness
instead of
revenge.
Some more links
A review of her book, I am Malala, from the Washington Post
For more on fundamentalists see my 4
October 2013 post.
For more on the psychology of religion
see news stories on my Facebook page.
No comments:
Post a Comment